The Trouble with Trouble with the Curve

1354895031_trouble-with-the-curve

Directed by Robert Lorenz
Starring Clint Eastwood, Amy Adams, Justin Timberlake, Matthew Lillard, John Goodman
Grade: F

Most people don’t know this and therefore might think this a crazy statement, but the game of baseball is at the forefront of a new war between the young and the old, the newcomers versus the old guard. The old are, understandably, wary of relinquishing their post so they reject the new methods as robbery of the world’s humanity. Meanwhile, the young are overzealous in all their newfound knowledge and can come off a bit pompous. In baseball, specifically, the information age has given us seemingly infinite amounts of data and with it countless new stats and metrics, all designed to further understanding of the game. This terrifies and then enrages, as one tends to follow the other, the old guard. Trouble with the Curve, directed by Robert Lorenz, is the horribly biased movie version of this argument. The film hates technology and anybody who believes it can be used for good is automatically a villain. Insulting to baseball fans, movie watchers, and every single member of this cast, Trouble with the Curve is a manipulative, self-serving, and entirely dishonest film.

The action follows Gus (Clint Eastwood), an aging scout with failing eyesight. He once was the best scout in the business, we know this because we are told this repeatedly just in case we ever doubted. He’s grumpy and dismissive to everyone he meets, though nobody seems bothered by it except his daughter Mickey (Amy Adams), whom he has neglected ever since her mother died when she was six. A big reveal late in the movie, and a disgusting piece of audience manipulation, is that Gus caught some random baseball guy molesting Mickey in a woodshed after a game when she was six and sent her away in order to protect her. Mickey, named after Mickey Mantle because this is a way to establish both that Gus is obsessed with baseball and has no idea to relate to a daughter, is up for a promotion to partner at the law firm she works at. Sound familiar? Probably because that’s the go to premise of any shitty movie where the young, overworked professional must learn a valuable lesson about loving something simple. Anyway, she takes a vacation in the middle of a crucial case, which spoiler alert will cost her that fancy partnership before the movie’s through, to accompany Gus as he scouts a young high school ballplayer. While on this trip, Mickey meets Johnny (Justin Timberlake), a former player who was drafted by her father but after blowing his arm out is trying his hand at scouting. Naturally, they fall in love, though she resists because she must put her career ahead of all relationships. Also, the player they’re scouting is a total piece of shit who has no appreciation for anything, and in the film’s climax Mickey and Gus prove that he has “trouble with the curve,” thus rendering those computer-stat nerds-geeks-assholes-queers into complete frauds and failures and the most vile one of them all gets fired.

As far as the performances go, there is nothing really impressive going on either. Eastwood is clearly on autopilot, grunting and growling his way through every scene. I suspect that Eastwood did this movie as a favor as Lorenz worked as his assistant director for many years and this was his directorial debut. Amy Adams is supposed to be the emotional center of the film, and to her credit she does what she can with the role, but the character is so stock and clichéd that it comes up empty. Timberlake is his usual charming self but only exists in this movie as a plot device. John Goodman is a welcome relief and in his small role as the scouting director of the Atlanta Braves easily gives the best performance. Matthew Lillard is only there to be snaky and I suppose he does that pretty well. You might be thinking to yourself, “hey this is a pretty good cast,” and you’d be right and that’s what makes this movie so infuriating. To assemble a talented and charismatic cast and then reduce them to uninteresting movie clichés is just a bummer.

I won’t go into all the ways this movie also gets the baseball details wrong too, as I’m sure many readers won’t care, but rest assured the way that the talent is scouted and drafted in this movie is absolutely not the way it works in real life (and in what fucking world do the Red Sox get the first overall draft pick? They’d never be bad enough for that). All I’ll say is that this movie fails on virtually every conceivable angle and does not bode well for Robert Lorenz’s directing career. It seems Trouble with the Curve was simply made to be the anti Moneyball, which is fine in its own right, I suppose, but whereas Moneyball certainly had issues of baseball accuracy of its own, at least it was a good movie.

The Master

The Master poster

Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson
Starring: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Joaquin Phoenix, Amy Adams
Grade: B+

Sometimes the controversial or provocative subject matter in a film can dominate the conversation and overshadow the film itself. The Master, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, is one such movie. Yes, it is a thinly veiled attack on Scientology, there is no question about that and there shouldn’t be. The thing that seems to get missed is that Anderson and his cast aren’t interested in convincing you that Scientology is a fraud, they just accept that it is and move on with the story. To say The Master is a film about the evils of Scientology is like saying Schindlers List is a movie about the evils of Nazism, or The Dark Knight is about the evils of the mob and clowns. This movie is both much simpler than that and much more complex, a simple attack on Scientology is far too easy for a director of the caliber of Anderson. What the film is really concerned with are two men who are drawn to each other despite their best interests, despite the disruption and chaos they cause in each other’s lives. They bring out the worst in each other, though occasionally the best.

The plot follows Freddie (Joaquin Phoenix), a sailor, returning home from war and struggling with a vicious case of PTSD and alcoholism, though it seems clear he had some mental issues beforehand. He drifts around until his special moonshine nearly kills an old man and he’s accused of poisoning him, so he stows away on a boat of what appears to be a well-to-do gathering. There he meets the charismatic Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the leader of The Cause, a cult like collection of people who believe in past and future lives and seek to perfect the soul as it is the true being and the body being merely a vessel. Dodd immediately takes a liking to Freddie’s moonshine and takes him in. The story then goes broad, following Dodd as he evangelizes The Cause, tries to cure Freddie, while his wife, Peggy (Amy Adams), keeps a tight rein on him and his own demons. Also, periodically Freddie flips out and beats the living shit out of anyone who publicly questions Dodd and his beliefs. These are two men headed toward self-destruction, one who is perfectly okay with that, while one is desperately trying to prove there is no crazy. If Dodd can cure Freddie, there just might be hope for himself.

joaquin-pheonix-600

Hoffman and Adams steal the show here. Hoffman brings charisma, danger, instability, manipulation, and boat loads of charm to the role of Lancaster Dodd and makes it so much his own character that the viewer doesn’t need to think of the comparisons to L. Ron Hubbard, because Dodd is his own man with his own set of problems. Amy Adams, meanwhile, keeps herself controlled to the point of unease and to where we understand that while Lancaster is manipulating everyone around him and bending them to his will, Peggy is pulling the strings on him. Peggy never loses her cool, never raises her voice, but is very calmly, and confidently, critical of anything that doesn’t support the survival of The Cause.

The problem here is Phoenix. Joaquin has become like a darker, more twisted, Johnny Depp. He can play weird, strange, intense, and quirky characters very well but seems to leave it at that. Like his Burton-lovin’ peer, he fails to find the humanity in these strange characters he creates. In The Master, there are a few scenes where Freddie feels genuine, and I’m referring to almost any scene where he’s one on one with Hoffman, but for the most part he comes up short. We need to follow Freddie through this movie but he’s just not very empathetic and any time he’s on screen without Hoffman or Adams the film kind of drags.

Destructive friendships don’t always have to end in destruction, and the end of Freddie’s journey, at least the one we see on screen, feels very satisfactory. Of course, the film doesn’t let him off completely easy and it’s slightly ambiguous, but it at least sets up the possibility that he might just have a life ahead of him after all. Dodd, meanwhile, seems to be the true prisoner at the end, chained to The Cause he himself created, his actions seemingly completely out of his control. Their friendship is unsustainable because one wants to conquer the world while the other is simply okay with trying to live in it for a while. Neither man is free, one a prisoner of mental illness and alcoholism, the other a prisoner of ambition, though whose ambition is not entirely evident.

Buy this movie!

http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=8870397&style=movie&frm=lk_Somedamnfool